Again, I will repeat that I will eagerly await the court's decision on this.

Before anyone gets on their high horse, let's not forget that we're also in the middle of a pretty fucking big constitutional crisis.

I'm sorry that we haven't been able to respond as quickly as people would like, but I'm more worried about having our house in order rather that sounding off on a region we aren't even remotely prepared to help.

-tsunamy
[forum admin]

Reply

HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC [1523.HQ] EXECUTIVE ACTION CHALLENGE SUBMISSION 08 APRIL 2015 | JUSTICIABILITY 04 MARCH 2021 Whereas this Court has been asked to exercise the judicial power vested in it by Article VIII of the Charter of the South Pacific, it is resolved as follows: DETERMINATION OF JUSTICIABILITY This case is not found justiciable. SUBMISSION OF REQUESTS FOR AN IN-CHAMBERS OPINION Interested parties may request the Chief Justice to provide an opinion with the reasons that led to this determination no later than 14 March 2021 10:00 UTC. It is so ordered. 1523.HQ.DJ | Issued 06 March 2021

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

Reply