I believe that the United Front/CESTA needs its own forum. If created its subforums shall be: UF/CESTA Council Debates, UF/CESTA Accession Deliberations, UF/CESTA Suspension and Expulsion Deliberations. The highlighted threads shall be: "Membership in the United Front/CESTA" and "The United Front: Charter Discussion".

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply

And the thread "The United Front"? Its basically our accession thread. Or our HQ, idk.

Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)

Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)

Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)

Quotes

"The 1% is like a 1% battery charge. It will die out if it is not charged(the charge is the 99%). But if you don't charge it, it will die for sure, sooner or later"
- Me (2001- Present)

"Change is the world's blood"
- Me (2001-Present)

[Image: 9ehfkQV.png]

Reply

A subforum has been created. Please, let this not be any indication that all new organisations will or should get their own subforum. Each organisation is considered on a case by case basis, with the understanding that it is not our objective to be creating more subforums.

tl;dr UF did deserve a forum, but please remember that our default is that new subforums should not be created, unless a need is proven or evident.

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

Reply

You forget the Punchwood accession thread.

4× Cabinet minister /// 1× OWL director /// CRS member /// SPSF

My History

Reply