| CESTA Council Debate: Multiple memberships |
|
Some countries are saying that the establishment of numerous organizations would lead to countries being torn if associated organizations conflict with each other. Now, I don't want that to happen, but as I see it, a country's membership in multiple organizations should not be so worrisome. If anything, it is linking all of these organizations, which would one day lead to the depolarization of the South Pacific. The Qvaitican Republic supports depolarization, because depolarization would lead to fewer conflicts in the region, which would lead down a road to peace.
Having multiple memberships would lessen the divisiveness of the region and unite the countries of the South Pacific. In fact, I think that it is time that we, the countries of the South Pacific, form a forum consisting of all the countries of the South Pacific. I have long-supported the formation of such a forum, and it is time to have it. It is time for unity in this region, and if we don't have it, then there will still be conflicts in this region.
We support this idea.
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)
Local Council Member(April 24-August 11) Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)
We support it, however, we are interested in how it will be implemented.
Darkstrait :ninja:
Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek "Hats is very fashion this year."
You'll have to elaborate more instead of just throwing the idea out there, but otherwise we agree.
<33
We would call it "the Pacific Forum," (OOC: and it would be similar to that of the United Nations.)
|
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Quotes
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |