We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Poll: Should the CSS member in question be recalled?
You do not have permission to vote in this poll.
Aye
50.00%
14 50.00%
Nay
35.71%
10 35.71%
Abstain
14.29%
4 14.29%
Total 28 vote(s) 100%
* You voted for this item. [Show Results]

Recall of Sam111 from the Committee of State Security
#1

This is a vote on a motion to recall Sam111 from his position as a member of the Committee of State Security.

Pursuant to Article 2.4 of the Code of Laws, the procedures for voting are as follows

Quote: Wrote:4. The official is recalled should 75% of votes cast in favor of such.

Voters may vote 'Aye' should they support the recall, 'Nay' should they oppose, and 'Abstain' should they choose to abstain from voting.

The motion requires 75% of voters to vote in favour in order to pass. The voting period will last for 3 days

Debate on the motion can be viewed here and here.

Voting will conclude on Friday, 4 March 2016 at 11:13am (GMT+8). A countdown timer is available here.




#2

This is now open for voting




#3

Would it make sense to update the debate hyperlink?
SibDis

#4

(03-02-2016, 08:30 PM)Siberian Wrote: Would it make sense to update the debate hyperlink?

Updated. Thanks.




#5

Pursuant to this, member Kithara has resolved to vote via PM. The member had casted an 'Aye' vote, being in favour of this motion.




This vote has failed 15-10 (60.00%) with 4 abstention(s). As the percentage of voters who voted in favour is below the required 75% threshold, Sam111 is not recalled from the Committee of State Security.








Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .