Glad to see you believe we're all afforded an equal voice at the table.

Speaking of having a voice, why did the Cabinet feel it was so pressing to make this decision on their own without even mentioning it to the Assembly? Was this an oversight or a lack of trust?

If you don't participate in a region and only come to try and 'skew' results after some 'big thing' that happens, then you shouldn't be allowed a voice.
So many people have explained themselves already that it's not funny. No one's going to answer you. Do some research.

I'm sorry but the laws do not consider such a thing as "ooh look how much spam he or she does, or how much she debates and argues". That is not the way the legal systems work, other than the activity clauses. Wolf's voice should be as valid as anyone else's as long as he is within the legality of his position. You are being an ass about it just cuz you dislike what he says, Zak, come on.

You are just a puppet... You have no soul!

Reply

We can debate issues without resorting to name-calling.

Reply

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

Reply