or Create an account
  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives Fudgetopia Hall of Government Assembly of the South Pacific [Awe/Tsu] Amendment to Article VI of the Charter

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[Awe/Tsu] Amendment to Article VI of the Charter
  • Offline Seraph
    Etymology Shark
  • ******
  • Joined:       Apr 2016
    Posts:       3,681
    Threads:       239
    Rep:       1,706
    Credits: 75,580¢
#61
08-13-2016, 02:00 PM

I also second this motion.
  • Offline Griffindor
    Yes, you are reading this.
  • Joined:       Apr 2014
    Posts:       1,919
    Threads:       38
    Rep:       229
    Credits: 0¢
#62
08-13-2016, 03:57 PM

sixth??
-Griffindor/Ebonhand
-Current Roles/Positions
-Legislator 2/24/20-
-High Court Justice 6/7/20-
-South Pacific Coral Guard 11/17/20-
-Minister of Engagement 6/17/22-

-Past Roles/Positions
-Legislator 7/3/16-4/10/18
-Secretary of State 4/3/20-2/24/21
-Chair of the APC 9/24/16-5/31/17
-Vice-Chair of the APC 6/1/17-4/10/18
-Local Council Member 7/1/17-11/17/17
-Citizen 5/2012-12/2014 and  2/26/16-7/3/2016
  • Offline Omega
    Reviresco
  • *****
  • Joined:       Sep 2015
    Posts:       2,208
    Threads:       199
    Rep:       585
    Credits: 48,780¢
#63
08-13-2016, 04:06 PM

Okay can someone please post the proposal that has been motioned and sixthed just so I know exactly what we would be voting on.
Above all else, I hope to be a decent person.
Has Been
What's Next?
 
CoA: August 2016-January 2017
Minister of Foreign Affairs: October 2019-June 2020, October 2020- February 2021
  • Offline sandaoguo
    Bane of TSP
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       5,128
    Threads:       405
    Rep:       1,152
    Credits: 2,920,200¢
#64
10-04-2016, 05:01 PM

Quote:7. The Minister of Foreign Affairs holds the sole power to initiate treaty negotiations with other regions, groups, and organizations, but may designate officers to handle those negotiations. Upon completion of a treaty negotiation, the Minister must present it to the full executive for majority approval, before submitting it to the Assembly for ratification.

8. Should a majority of the Cabinet agree to dissolve a treaty, or should another signatory initiate dissolution, the Minister of Foreign Affairs shall put the matter up for five days of mandated discussion in the Assembly, after which the treaty shall be dissolved officially.

9. The Minister of Foreign Affairs will be responsible for establishing standards for the creation and maintenance of consulates and embassies.

I would like to motion these simple changes to vote. It spells out the required threshold for the Cabinet's decision, which is the same as for signing a treaty in the first place. It also makes it abundantly clear that the treaty is dissolved officially after the discussion period.
(This post was last modified: 10-04-2016, 05:01 PM by sandaoguo.)
#65
10-05-2016, 02:27 AM

I would like to urge that there be a clause mandating a 5 day debate period and 3 day voting period to dissolve a treaty when treaty dissolution is considered from our end.
  • Offline sandaoguo
    Bane of TSP
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       5,128
    Threads:       405
    Rep:       1,152
    Credits: 2,920,200¢
#66
10-05-2016, 01:03 PM

This isn't a proposal for voting. It's the opposite.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
  • Offline Roavin
    offenda
  • *******
  • Joined:       Apr 2016
    Posts:       4,421
    Threads:       355
    Rep:       2,198
    Credits: 2,629,620¢
#67
10-09-2016, 07:33 PM

Second.
[Image: XXPV74Y.png?1]
  • Offline Punchwood
    Posting Freak
  • *****
  • Joined:       Apr 2014
    Posts:       2,318
    Threads:       141
    Rep:       34
    Credits: 0¢
#68
10-10-2016, 07:59 AM

So remind me again, the point in voying down both bills was so that we could vote on the same bills again? That wasn't a waste of time and a complete drama because?
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice
  • Offline Belschaft
    Evil Emeritus
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       6,189
    Threads:       132
    Rep:       834
    Credits: 0¢
#69
10-10-2016, 08:41 AM

No, it was because the Awe/Tsu amendment had major issues with it - notice the complete rewriting Glen has done - that made a trip to the court inevitable.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
[Image: B9ytUsy.png]
[+] PREVIOUS ROLES




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Hall of Historical Records Archives Fudgetopia Hall of Government Assembly of the South Pacific [Awe/Tsu] Amendment to Article VI of the Charter


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .