| [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac |
In accordance with Article 4.12 of the Court Procedures Act, the Court may exercise its discretion to grand additional time for the collection of evidence, should it be necessary. Will the Prosecution make any requests to that effect?
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Your honor,
given the uncertainty that the desired additional evidence can be achieved, and the Prosecution's belief that the evidence already presented, if approved by the Court, is sufficient to construct its argument, and in the interests for a reasonably timely conclusion to the proceedings, the Prosecution will refrain from making such a request at this time. The prosecution does kindly request that it may be permitted to motion for such an extension should the Court disapprove of evidence already submitted. ![[Image: XXPV74Y.png?1]](https://i.imgur.com/XXPV74Y.png?1)
Both the Prosecution and the Defence are advised that the Court Procedures Act does not contemplate the extemporaneous admission of additional evidence and witnesses. Is it still the intent of both parties not to request an extension of the time allotted to gather evidence and witnesses?
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Your honor,
since the Court has implied that it will neither grant submissions after evidence approval nor after the beginning of the proper trial phase, the Prosecution requests a one week extension.
An extension of one calendar week is granted to the Prosecution and the Defence for the submission of evidence and witness names.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Your honour,
At this time the Defence still has no evidence to submit, assuming usual evidential burdens will be applied? Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator ![[Image: B9ytUsy.png]](https://i.imgur.com/B9ytUsy.png)
That would be a fair assumption.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Your honor,
thank you for the additional granted time. The investigation has concluded, unfortunately without additional evidence for submission.
Whereas the Court Procedures Act requires the High Court to evaluate the propriety of every piece of evidence and witness that either party to a criminal case submits, it is ordered as follows:
Those facts that were brought to the attention of the Court by the Prosecution have been so noted.
In accordance with the Court Procedures Act, the Prosecution and the Defence will have an opportunity to mutually agree on a reasonable time for the collection of witness testimony. In the event that no such agreement prove possible, the Court will determine a time. A limit of three calendar days will be given for the communication of the agreed upon time, with the possibility of an extension at the discretion of the Court. It is so ordered. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Your honour,
In light of the list of approved evidence, Defence requests leave to present an extraordinary motion to dismiss charges. Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator |
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
PREVIOUS ROLES | Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |