| The official two post a month thread |
(07-20-2014, 08:09 PM)God-Emperor Wrote: Ya haven't contributed enough to the region over the years for continued citizenship accordin' to our admins, but good thing ya've posted before or they woulda deleted your account. There is no such thing as "continued citizenship" for people that have contributed in the past. You could have founded the Coalition, but if you are not active now then there is no reason for you to continue being a citizen. If you feel like you can be active again, however, then you are most welcome to apply for citizenship. Unless the Assembly amends the Charter, we will not make exceptions for certain citizens. Checks are performed based on current activity, not past contributions. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Eh. I felt like it, but was kind of turned off by this policy.
It speaks volumes when a region demands posting activity as a prerequisite for maintaining citizenship. Volumes.
Yeah, like citizenship actually meaning something
Citizenship shouldn't come with strings attached.
my totally unbiased 2c
Excuse me. You discussing things and thread jacking. (Oh, that makes POST ONE!)
(07-20-2014, 08:58 PM)Todd McCloud Wrote: It speaks volumes when a region demands posting activity as a prerequisite for maintaining citizenship. Volumes. I'll take that as a compliment. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
(07-20-2014, 09:17 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(07-20-2014, 08:58 PM)Todd McCloud Wrote: It speaks volumes when a region demands posting activity as a prerequisite for maintaining citizenship. Volumes. I dunno... there are many regions that don't need to coax their citizens to post on their forums. They just kind of do it because they want to.
If you are really active then you won't even notice the requirement. If you want to be active but have a temporary problem IRL, then you can ask the Vice Delegate for a leave of absence. If you can't be bothered to post twice a month, then why would you want citizenship anyways?
And we'll leave it at that. If anyone wants to start a discussion about changing the 2-post requirement then the Assembly is the place to go. The Hall of Spam is not the appropriate place. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 2 Guest(s) |