Criminal Complaint (charge someone with a crime under the Criminal Code) [1901] New Haudenosaunee Confederacy v. Concrete Slab |
(02-18-2019, 02:28 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: It is the 18th of February, Voly... Thank-you. I'm sure the court can use its own discretion to ignore my past the deadline comment. I was unaware you were appointed a court official. Legislator | Local Councilor | Aspiring TSP Curmudgeon Messages archived by the Ministry Of the Regal Executive - Bureaucratic Services
The following 4 users Like Volaworand's post:
• Lily Pad, New Haudenosaunee Confederacy, Rebeltopia, The Sakhalinsk Empire
The Court has the following questions for @Concrete Slab;
Article 3.1 of the Charter allows for “the freedoms of expression, speech, assembly, and the press, limited only by reasonable moderation policies” whilst Article 5.3 of the Charter empowers the Local Council “to suppress messages on the Regional Message Board according to a standard moderation policy”. 1. By what moderation policy did you determine that the use of the word “Damn” by NHC was to be suppressed? 2. How did you determine that this moderation policy was reasonable? 3. Has this moderation policy been enforced consistently at all times and with regards to all players? 4. If this moderation policy has not been enforced consistently at all times and with regards to all players, are there any mitigating reasons or circumstances that might justify this? Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
My apologies for the late response, Justice.
1.) I used Clause IX of the [url=https://www.nationstates.net/page=dispatch/id=1130268]RMB Rules and Etiquette dispatch, which states, "No Inappropriate Things Excessive swearing, harmful messages, sexual references, etc. will be suppressed on sight, and the moderators could even get involved. Keep it up, and you will be booted from the region." 2.) I determined the use of this policy reasonable based on the readings of the dispatch and my own personal ethics. 3.) I have tried my hardest to give nations equal moderation while I am online, but have infringed on my own beliefs by using the word in moments of anger, and for this, I apologize.
Concrete Slab
Coral Guard Member 5x Local Councillor TSP Legislator and Citizen Ambassador to the League Author of GAR #471, #479, and SCR #271 Co-author of SCR #300 Founded 1/25/18
I would like to note that Slab is changing his policy on the word "damn" just to make his answers true.
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34610466
how am i even still a legislator at this point...?
(02-28-2019, 05:46 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: I would like to note that Slab is changing his policy on the word "damn" just to make his answers true. I would also like to note that this has ALWAYS been my policy, but I cannot be on every minute of everyday. This is why we have three Local Councillors, see?
Concrete Slab
Coral Guard Member 5x Local Councillor TSP Legislator and Citizen Ambassador to the League Author of GAR #471, #479, and SCR #271 Co-author of SCR #300 Founded 1/25/18
(02-28-2019, 05:49 PM)Concrete Slab Wrote:It wasn't your policy 4 hours ago.(02-28-2019, 05:46 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: I would like to note that Slab is changing his policy on the word "damn" just to make his answers true. https://ibb.co/vLHbM0N
how am i even still a legislator at this point...?
(02-28-2019, 05:55 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote:(02-28-2019, 05:49 PM)Concrete Slab Wrote:It wasn't your policy 4 hours ago.(02-28-2019, 05:46 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: I would like to note that Slab is changing his policy on the word "damn" just to make his answers true. Like I said. I cannot be on every second of every day.
Concrete Slab
Coral Guard Member 5x Local Councillor TSP Legislator and Citizen Ambassador to the League Author of GAR #471, #479, and SCR #271 Co-author of SCR #300 Founded 1/25/18
(02-28-2019, 05:56 PM)Concrete Slab Wrote:Fair enough, but it wasn't your policy 21 days ago.(02-28-2019, 05:55 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote:(02-28-2019, 05:49 PM)Concrete Slab Wrote:It wasn't your policy 4 hours ago.(02-28-2019, 05:46 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: I would like to note that Slab is changing his policy on the word "damn" just to make his answers true. https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34347942
how am i even still a legislator at this point...?
I would ALSO like to note that Slab has basically admitted to ignoring the charter.
https://www.nationstates.net/region=the_...#p34610810
how am i even still a legislator at this point...?
The Court has the following question of Local Councillors @The Solar System Scope & @Divine Owl;
Article 3.1 of the Charter allows for “the freedoms of expression, speech, assembly, and the press, limited only by reasonable moderation policies” whilst Article 5.3 of the Charter empowers the Local Council “to suppress messages on the Regional Message Board according to a standard moderation policy”. 1. Is the use of the word “Damn” on TSP’s RMB limited by a reasonable, standard moderation policy? Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
The following 5 users Like Belschaft's post:
• Divine Owl, Lily Pad, New Haudenosaunee Confederacy, Poppy, The Solar System Scope |
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |