We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

[PASSED] Amendments to the Law Standards Act (Amendment formatting)
#1

I present these amendments to the Law Standards Act. They relate specifically to Articles 3, 5, and Addendum 1.

My two main changes are to include the title of the law, as well as the article name in all future amendments. I do not feel so strongly about the ellipses and do not mind removing it if people feel it is unnecessary.

Quote:
Law Standards Act
 
...

3. Amendments and Repeals

(1) The standard format for an amendment will be to note which law, article, and section of a law is being amended, and to quote only that part of the law.

...

(4) Ellipses will be used to indicate an intentional omission of a whole article, section, or sub-section.

...

5. Reformatting of Laws and Legislation

...

(3) The Chair of the Assembly may renumber articles, sections, and sub-sections where appropriate.

...

Addendum 1 – Example of an Amendment

Quote:
THE CHARTER OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC

...

IV. THE LOCAL COUNCIL

...

7. The Local Council representative will have the power to cast have an additional weighted block vote worth of one-fifth 20% of all non-abstaining votes cast on bills, not including the block vote, giving them a one-sixth share of the total vote, excluding abstentions. The Chair will calculate how many votes are allotted to the representative at the close of each vote, rounding them to the nearest whole number, and will then add the representative’s total votes to the final tally.
[-] The following 2 users Like Amerion's post:
  • Poppy, Rebeltopia
#2

Nested quotes should work.

Quote:Outer
Quote:Inner

No objections to your proposal.
[Image: XXPV74Y.png?1]
[-] The following 1 user Likes Roavin's post:
  • Amerion
#3

Full support. The ellipses would be very useful.
Smile
[-] The following 1 user Likes Techganet's post:
  • Amerion
#4

(02-03-2019, 02:37 AM)Techganet Wrote: Full support. The ellipses would be very useful.

I agree. We're de facto using them already.
The Sakhalinsk Empire, Legislator of the South Pacific
Currently a citizen and legislator of TSP. I am active as Sverigesriket in Europe.

Complete Conflict of Interest
[-] The following 1 user Likes The Sakhalinsk Empire's post:
  • Amerion
#5

Very neat.
Founder of the Church of the South Pacific [Forum Thread] [Discord], a safe place to discuss spirituality for people of all faiths and none (currently looking for those interested in prayer and/or "home" groups);
And The Silicon Pens [Discord], a writer's group for the South Pacific and beyond!

Yahweo usenneo ir varleo, ihraneo jurlaweo hraseu seu, ir jiweveo arladi.
Salma 145:8
[-] The following 1 user Likes Seraph's post:
  • Amerion
#6

(02-02-2019, 11:53 PM)Roavin Wrote: Nested quotes should work.

Quote:Outer
Quote:Inner

No objections to your proposal.

Oh, indeed they do. Thank you Blush
#7

The amendment text has been revised and the OP updated:

Quote:(4) Ellipses will be used to indicate an intentional omission of a whole article, or section, or sub-section.
[-] The following 2 users Like Amerion's post:
  • Rebeltopia, Roavin
#8

I motion a vote.
#9

Second
[Image: XXPV74Y.png?1]
#10

[Image: TZwtVaB.png]

6 February 2019

Legislators,

Please be advised that the vote to amend Articles 3, 5, and Addendum 1 of the Law Standards Act has been opened. The vote has been designated in the Assembly's official record as A1902.04 and referred to in full as Amendments to the Law Standards Act (Amendment formatting).

Legislators may cast their vote here.

The vote will end on the 9th of February, 2019, at 8:50 a.m. (UTC).




Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .