Possibly, but not necessarily; it would have depended on how that evidence looked by itself, and within the broader context of the case. What the Court considers isn't whether or not someone lied, but rather if that lie (1) was grossly misleading, and (2) caused damages. Based on the evidence we had on your submission, while NHC possibly misrepresented the nature of your telegrams, we were not convinced that it rose to the level of grossly misleading, or that damages had been adequately established.

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

Reply

Thanks for the Courts time, consideration and the explanation.  I appreciate it.

---

Legislator | Local Councilor | Aspiring TSP Curmudgeon
Messages archived by the Ministry Of the Regal Executive - Bureaucratic Services

---

Reply