---

High Court of the South Pacific
Case Submission

---

Your Honours,

I, Whole India, respectfully submit the following case for consideration by the High Court. I hereby state that the information within this submission is true, to the best of my knowledge, and that there is no malicious intent or vexatious nature to it. I further promise to make myself available to any future questions or request from the Court in order to ensure that this case is fairly considered.

Nation: Whole India

Reference Name: Legal Question on RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS

Description: Your Honor,

The Third Article of the Charter's First Clause states " All members of the South Pacific will enjoy the freedoms of expression, speech, assembly, and the press, limited only by reasonable moderation policies."

So I request the Court interpret it.

Question: What is the meaning of the First Clause of the Third Article of the Charter

(This post was last modified: 09-12-2020, 11:50 AM by Kris Kringle. Edit Reason: [Chief Justice Edit] Updated the title of the thread with the DFN. )

Reply

HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC [2006] RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS SUBMISSION 12 SEPTEMBER 2020

Notice is given that this question has been received by the High Court and has been assigned all the necessary identifying information as follows: DOCKET FILE NUMBER 2006 REFERENCE NAME Rights and Freedoms QUESTION What is the meaning of the First Clause of the Third Article of the Charter? The petitioner and other interested parties are invited to explain the necessity of a decision on this matter over the next 24 hours. Briefs Amicus Curiae on the preferred eventual outcome of this case are not required at this time.

2006.NR | Issued 12 September 2020

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

Reply

HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC [2006] RIGHTS AND FREEDOMS SUBMISSION 12 SEPTEMBER 2020 | JUSTICIABILITY 12 SEPTEMBER 2020

Whereas this Court has been asked to exercise the judicial power vested in it by Article VIII of the Charter of the South Pacific, it is resolved as follows: DETERMINATION OF JUSTICIABILITY This case is not found justiciable. SUBMISSION OF REQUESTS FOR AN IN-CHAMBERS OPINION Interested parties may request the Chief Justice to provide an opinion with the reasons that led to this determination no later than 7 calendar days from now. It is so ordered.

2006.DJ | Issued 12 September 2020

Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System

(This post was last modified: 09-12-2020, 06:51 PM by Kris Kringle.)

Reply