| Forum Administration Act |
*puts on CoA hat*
So guys, we now have two extensive threads on this. Do we have legislation we want to come from this or not?
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
(06-10-2014, 08:50 AM)Rebeltopia Wrote:(06-10-2014, 01:37 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote: It so happens that I had spoken with r3naissanc3r a few days ago and he mentioned that he couldn't access his account. I pointed out that it had probably been deleted as per our pruning policy. If his account was deleted then obviously it was unused. That's not even a serious question. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
So, back to my original question in the original thread... what's constituting "active"? Log in? Posts?
"...if you're normal, the crowd will accept you. But if you're deranged, the crowd will make you their leader." - Christopher Titus
Deranged in NS since 2011 One and ONLY minion of LadyRebels The OUTRAGEOUS CRAZY other half of LadyElysium
Activation and 1 post, RT. That secures activity "forever."
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
Ok. Let me rephrase.
If one logs in every day for the next 7 days, but doesn't post, will their account be deleted because they aren't "active"?
"...if you're normal, the crowd will accept you. But if you're deranged, the crowd will make you their leader." - Christopher Titus
Deranged in NS since 2011 One and ONLY minion of LadyRebels The OUTRAGEOUS CRAZY other half of LadyElysium
... I'm going to defer to GR or Kris on that. I'm not familiar enough with the intricacies of the process.
However, it's my understanding that they would.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
I keep seeing the call for compromise, but the assembly really isn't in the position to compromise. This is an admin policy dictated by the admins.
If you want my input, clean up inactive accounts after a year. Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
The 16th Delegate of The South Pacific
Rebs & Tsu: rights now pruning is set to accounts that were never activated or haven't posted in 7 days.
SB: I think a year is too much, but it's still something I could work with. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
I really just want a time frame that would show clear abandonment. Even half a year would be okay, but the issue is one week is very aggressive, and the case we have shows that accounts that are inactive for a week aren't always abandoned.
Sent from my DROID RAZR using Tapatalk
The 16th Delegate of The South Pacific
(06-10-2014, 11:27 AM)southern bellz Wrote: I really just want a time frame that would show clear abandonment. Even half a year would be okay, but the issue is one week is very aggressive, and the case we have shows that accounts that are inactive for a week aren't always abandoned. That sounds reasonable to me. I can't speak for Tsu or Glen, but I'm willing to go along with that. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System |
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
POSITIONS! POSITIONS, EVERYONE!!
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |