| Wolf for General Corps |
(04-28-2015, 12:05 AM)Sandaoguo Wrote: Defenders having a problem working with the leader of a crasher military. Who'd ever of thunk? And yet, ironically, Defenders had no problem working with me on joint targets or operations, such as Nazi Europe or, more recently, Lazarus. It seems when there is a mutual interest, suddenly alignment no longer matters. Since the SPSF is a military force that represents The South Pacific, our first and primary interest is to represent TSP and it's interests, no matter what those interests may be. I know some, not all, Defenders have a hard time with this Regionalist concept, and perhaps that's why experienced Defenders are lacking not only in the SPSF but in most of the Feeder armies in Nationstates.
The issue, Wolf, is that my idea of TSP's interests as a defender and your idea of TSP's interests as a raider are different.
There's nothing inherently wrong with that. I don't know why I'm being disparaged for being honest about what I do and don't want the SPSF to do. We all have preferences there, and it's useless pretending like saying they're raider or defender is antithetical to TSP.
Because we've engaged in honest debates about this over and over again.
We've debated to death as a region military alignment, we've debated structure, and we've even debated if we should have one. The results have been answers you don't like. And you're resorting to trying to undermine an SPSF you don't like. It's just incredibly sad to see someone have the attitude if something doesn't go my way, I'd rather see it fail.
The 16th Delegate of The South Pacific
I don't think Glen wants to see the Special Forces fail.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
(04-28-2015, 04:58 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: I don't think Glen wants to see the Special Forces fail. Your right Kris, he doesn't. In his eyes, we already have. I recall him saying earlier in this very thread that SPSF was a " failed experiment". Of course, I am sick, I may very well be imagining things. Officially being omnipotent via Tapatalk
An eye for an eye just makes the whole world go blind.
~Mahatma Gandhi
(04-28-2015, 05:06 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: And Wolf will make sure it doesn't. Henn, it should be your job to ensure it doesn't. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
(04-28-2015, 05:25 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:Exactly. You are the MoA. It is your job.(04-28-2015, 05:06 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: And Wolf will make sure it doesn't.
Darkstrait :ninja:
Former Justice, Former Local Councilor, Roleplayer, Former SPSF Deputy for Recruitment, Politically Active Citizen, Ex-Spammer Supreme, and Resident Geek "Hats is very fashion this year."
(04-28-2015, 05:54 PM)Darkstrait Wrote:(04-28-2015, 05:25 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:Exactly. You are the MoA. It is your job.(04-28-2015, 05:06 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: And Wolf will make sure it doesn't. Echoing another person's statement isn't going to help the case, whatever it may be. I know it's my job, hence why we've got 4 new recruits. I fully intend on doubling that number before the end of my term, and with Wolf, it shall be more streamlined. When is the next Assembly Review of the SPSF? ProfessorHenn on Tapatalk. |
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
RP-Government Information
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |