We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Sunshine Law Expansion
#1

The Sunshine Law currently stands as follows:


I would like to see the Sunshine Law expanded to encompass the CSS and the various Ministries. I recommend this not only in the interests of making TSP a more open region, but also so that newcomers to the region can look in the archives and see how those bodies operate. Opening this to the public would give newcomers a great idea on the day to day workings of the ministries and the CSS.

Any thoughts on this?
#2

This might need an expansion to include the Courts as well




#3

The Ministry of the Army has a private area to discuss operational details.
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs has a private area to discuss foreign policy strategy.
The Committee for State Security has a private area to discuss the internal security of the region.
I see no need to force the disclosure of those subforums, considering the security implications greatly outweigh the transparency benefits.

I would understand the argument for disclosing the High Court and Ministry of Regional Affairs, but I am still not a fan of forcing them to disclose their content. Regional Affairs routinely discloses its content on its own accord, except for ongoing discussions, so a law would not be necessary.

Furthermore, reading disclosed threads is not necessary to know how an institution works. A soldier will receive appropriate training. A fellow will be assigned to a project. A diplomat will learn nothing from what little content is in the FA area. A citizen will learn nothing from Lubyanka because our discussions are subject-specific and need-to-know.

I would not oppose extending 8-month disclosure to the High Court, but on all other institutions disclosure would be, in my opinion, undesirable.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
#4

I would support extending The Sunshine Law to The High Court, but not the rest.

#5

I also would support the High Court falling under the Sunshine Law.
#6

I would also support seeing the Sunshine Law extended to the court. But, like Kris said... most other ministries would be worthless or security issues.

Sent from my LG-D500 using Tapatalk
"...if you're normal, the crowd will accept you. But if you're deranged, the crowd will make you their leader." - Christopher Titus
Deranged in NS since 2011


One and ONLY minion of LadyRebels 
The OUTRAGEOUS CRAZY other half of LadyElysium
#7

No I support including the High Court and all the other organisations. TSP should be liberal, free and open. Not conservative, and closed.
Europeian Ambassador to The South Pacific
Former Local Council Member
Former Minister of Regional Affairs
Former High Court Justice
#8

I Would support extending the sunshine law to the high court but like others have said do not support extending it to the other areas.
Apad
King of Haldilwe
#9

(06-23-2015, 11:21 AM)Punchwood Wrote: No I support including the High Court and all the other organisations. TSP should be liberal, free and open. Not conservative, and closed.

Why not have the SPSF plan all operations in a public area beforehand while we're at it. (sarcasm)

Things like security SHOULD be conservative and closed. (NOT sarcasm)

#10

Punchwood, give me one reason why SPSF should publicly disclose operations. At all.


Don't mind me I'm just on Tapatalk
An eye for an eye just makes the whole world go blind.
~Mahatma Gandhi






Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .