| Broken Assembly? |
|
One post per opinion is a bad idea. That being said, maybe it would be wise to set a more established procedure for moving things along.
Maybe separate discussions into different "Readings" with strict time frames for discussion. For example, a "First Reading" upon posting might last 48 hours, and then a "Second Reading" could last another 24. The Chair could then move the legislation to a vote or proceed to a third reading if only it appeared productive to do so.
That seems unnecessarily bureaucratic.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator ![[Image: B9ytUsy.png]](https://i.imgur.com/B9ytUsy.png)
LOL
Escade ~ Positions Held in TSP ~ Delegate | Vice Delegate Minister of Regional Affairs, | Minister of Foreign Affairs | Minister of Military Affairs ~ The Sparkly One ~ My Pinterest
We need a facepalm smiley.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Yes, my penchant for bureaucratic systems (preferably with myself in a modest but surprisingly powerful role) is well known.
But even I have my limits. Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
Well, it would be better than what we have now. If it takes six pages to argue about fixing a typo, clearly there is something wrong.
Delegate of Spiritus
Vice Secretary-General of the World Assembly "When you are the potatoes guy everyone is like, 'Yeah, it's the potatoes guy!'" - Max Barry
(05-04-2014, 09:25 PM)The Salaxalans Wrote: Well, it would be better than what we have now. If it takes six pages to argue about fixing a typo, clearly there is something wrong. That's why we have a High Court in the first place, to decide on the issues that we aren't sure of. I'm hoping the Court won't take too long to decide on the question I submitted. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System (05-04-2014, 09:32 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:The legal answer is relatively simple, and we could write it up in about thirty minutes, but I said I'd give a minimum of three days for amicus briefs and I have.(05-04-2014, 09:25 PM)The Salaxalans Wrote: Well, it would be better than what we have now. If it takes six pages to argue about fixing a typo, clearly there is something wrong. Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator
Yeah, that pretty much covers it.
Delegate of Spiritus
Vice Secretary-General of the World Assembly "When you are the potatoes guy everyone is like, 'Yeah, it's the potatoes guy!'" - Max Barry |
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
PREVIOUS ROLES 
![[Image: 10155913_10152345121724282_953435365_n.jpg]](https://scontent-a-lga.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-prn2/t1.0-9/q71/s720x720/10155913_10152345121724282_953435365_n.jpg)
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |