The South Pacific
[LQ] [1909] Standard Moderation Policy - Printable Version

+- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz)
+-- Forum: Government District (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-5.html)
+--- Forum: High Court (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-50.html)
+--- Thread: [LQ] [1909] Standard Moderation Policy (/thread-6942.html)

Pages: 1 2


RE: [Question] Is "the LC can do whatever" a standard moderation policy? - Volaworand - 03-08-2019

I wish to inform the Court that the Complaintant in this file his chosen to not wait for a ruling on this matter but instead chose to engage in a series of double posting yesterday in a what he claimed was a protest.

Instead of waiting for this court to rule the Complainant has chosen to take actions clearly in violation of the law.

https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686583
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686674
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686695
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686766
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686846
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686875
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686898
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686926
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686967
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34686983
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687019
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687052
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687358
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687404
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34687421
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688116
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688116
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688531
https://www.nationstates.net/page=rmb/postid=34688546

(these quote point to the initial posts, that were followed by the improper double posts, which were then suppressed in accordance with the policy)

During this time The Complainant blocked telegrams from myself and refused to discuss his concerns privately.  The Complainant alleges that a warning that his post had been suppressed, directions on how to edit the post and link of the RMB guidelines constituted spam.

These actions show a clear lack of respect for this court, the region and its processes and laws. I request that the Court admonish the complainant for trolling and affirm the legally constituted status of the RMB Guidelines.


RE: [1909] Standard Moderation Policy - New Haudenosaunee Confederacy - 03-10-2019

This is not a complaint, Volaworand, it's a legal question.


Determination of Justiciability - Kris Kringle - 03-11-2019

[Image: BYEo2lg.png]

Determination of Justiciability

Whereas New Haudenosaunee Confederacy has requested this Court that a review be conducted on certain issues related to the interpretation of the law with the following question:

I ask the court if this, specifically the bolded part, is actually a standard moderation policy, as it is not consistently enforced, as shown by this, a double post by Sword of Summer (although the second post was later deleted, it was originally suppressed), and this double post by Concrete Slab.

Whereas this Court has conducted a careful review of the merits of such a request on the basis of its legal necessity and potential to impact present and future policies.

It is resolved with respect to these Legal Questions as follows:
  1. It is not deemed justiciable.
  2. The Court may provide an opinion on its reasons for issuing this determination, at the request of the petitioner, or any party so authorised by them, no later than seven days following the publication of this Determination.
It is so ordered.

Kris Kringle
Chief Justice



RE: [1909] Standard Moderation Policy - Volaworand - 03-12-2019

May I ask if, in the course the courts review of this legal question, it has made a determination on the legally constituted status of the RMB Guidelines as a standard moderation policy? 

If a determination on this status was made I request the Courts opinion on its reasons for issuing this determination.


RE: [1909] Standard Moderation Policy - Kris Kringle - 03-15-2019

The Court has made no determination, it has declined to hear the question on account of its non-justiciability.