[PASSED] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Printable Version +- The South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz) +-- Forum: Hall of Historical Records (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-8.html) +--- Forum: Archives (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-141.html) +---- Forum: Fudgetopia Hall of Government (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-12.html) +----- Forum: Assembly of the South Pacific (https://tspforums.xyz/forum-91.html) +----- Thread: [PASSED] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) (/thread-7542.html) |
RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Roavin - 10-30-2019 New draft! I left out Sascha's change to (1), but included the changes to (2) and (3), except that (2) was then rewritten with the same intent but with language that I find more pleasing. Quote:9. Temporary Injunctions RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Jebediah - 10-30-2019 (10-30-2019, 11:40 AM)Roavin Wrote: An injunction automatically expires when its associated case completes, unless it is grandfathered into a succeeding sentencing case if applicable. If someone violates the injunction, does the punishment expire when the case expires? RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Sasha - 10-30-2019 I am updating the first post with Roa's last compromise version. Thanks for the help! I hope this version is well-written enough to satisfy everyone and be passed. (10-30-2019, 02:03 PM)Jebediah Wrote:(10-30-2019, 11:40 AM)Roavin Wrote: An injunction automatically expires when its associated case completes, unless it is grandfathered into a succeeding sentencing case if applicable. Violating such an injunction would be in contempt of court and therefore be a (separate) crime. Therefore, the punishment for violating an injunction is not and cannot be bound to the original injunction. Of course the official sentence would not be immediate under current law (which may be reviewed) but the court may issue further injunctions (including some that cannot be evaded). RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Roavin - 12-05-2019 Sasha has disappeared but I still think we should have this. I think the most recent draft from Sasha's OP is great as is, so I'd like to motion it to vote. [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Kris Kringle - 12-05-2019 Should I understand that extensions can only be for four weeks, and not lesser amounts of time? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Roavin - 12-05-2019 Four weeks each, though there is no limit on how often an extension can be issued. [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Kris Kringle - 12-05-2019 What if I don’t think a four-week extension is warranted? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Roavin - 12-05-2019 Ah, I see what you're saying. Quote:(2) Any injunction must include a time limit not exceeding four weeks, after which it expires. An injunction may be extended at any time, with each extension also including a time limit not exceeding four weeks from the moment the extension is issued. An injunction automatically expires when its associated case completes, unless it is grandfathered into a succeeding sentencing case if applicable. This should make it clearer. RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Roavin - 12-08-2019 And now, motion to vote RE: [Draft] Amendment to the Judicial Act (Injunctions) - Omega - 12-09-2019 I'm a bit late to the party here but this is a great idea. |