(02-09-2016, 10:21 AM)sandaoguo Wrote: I agree that it's very sensible to have a list of issues Charter proposals need to address.

Though I imagine some of our more moderate members will prefer amendments, I think it's safe to say most of us are preparing entirely new documents.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

I think your post on another thread makes the point very well. Everyone produces their drafts and people then have specific points to talk about. But the discussion can only become meaningful if, within reason, it's possible to compare like with like. The problem with looking at drafts 'as a whole' is that personality becomes an issue. I've seen this in real-life drafting on many occasions.