CSS Recall of Sam111 |
(03-07-2016, 04:18 PM)Belschaft Wrote: Having been a CSS member, and knowing what it involves, there is absolutely no reason why anyone needs to go. The CSS does not handle anything that is of a nature where Glen and Kris shouldn't be able to work with Sam; they don't want to, but that isn't a good enough reason. TSP cannot be organised based upon what they want. If we get any intel that there might be a coup, I don't want Sam in on that convo. If we have to deal with any regional instability, I don't think Sam has very good judgement on what should be done. You're right-- I don't want to work with him. Because I don't trust him. And I don't trust him because he helped Hileville coup. That's not a shocking mystery. Most voters did the right thing and voted to recall a coup participant from the CSS. 14 people. 10 people got to block it. Forcing a revote shows that (a) this problem isn't going away just because people don't want to react rationally, (b) it's still a very serious issue, and © some of you accept dysfunction as the cost of feeling like you're winning at politics. Is it annoying? Yes, that's the entire point. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Users browsing this thread: |
2 Guest(s) |