(04-29-2016, 08:38 AM)Tsunamy Wrote: It's a mechanism for responsibility, Glen. We've had these discussions among ourselves, but the admin team needs to be responsible to SOMEONE. This circular logic of admins disciplining admins and deciding when and how admins can do what they do isn't right and in seriously sowing seeds of discontent.

The answer to this isn't to introduce more chaos. Voting isn't the automatic or best way to introduce 'responsibility.' It's probably the worst in this scenario. Frankly, just because a group of players doesn't like an admin doesn't mean that admin should be kicked out. They can learn to live with somebody they don't like. Political popularity is fleeting and turns on a dime in this game. Subjecting admins to politics is the problem, not the solution. If an admin is actually corrupt and abusing their power, that can be proven in court.