We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Prohibited Group Status for The Black Hawks
#31

I won't comment in detail, since there's always the chance the CSS could review this, but I do think this matter has some complexity, and simply arguing that the Milograd Coup happened four years ago (which is a fair point, since there are reasonable limits to when an event is too old) means ignoring more recent events that may provide more context as to the evolving attitudes of TBH towards GCR sovereignty.

Obviously the question remains of how well they fit the legal definition of "hostile group", and that is something either the Cabinet or the CSS will have to address, should they choose to do it.

Also, I have no problem with people swearing in their posts. Policing post content to that degree is a bad idea.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System


Messages In This Thread
RE: Prohibited Group Status for The Black Hawks - by Kris Kringle - 02-28-2017, 05:53 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .