Just going to point out that when The Black Hawks were even briefly mentioned in a negative context on our Discord server, Souls and Sygian swooped in to have an incredibly heated argument with Roavin about their pretty awful conduct toward him and Imki in the recent past.

And now we have Sygian defending The Black Hawks in the private halls of the Assembly by dismissing their violations of Feeder and Sinker sovereignty as irrelevant. He's showing no remorse and he doesn't think his conduct as a Black Hawk, or the conduct of his comrades, is a problem.

I'm not sure how we can say, with a straight face, that The Black Hawks aren't a threat to stack the Assembly and subvert the South Pacific. They meet the criteria of Article 4, they've done things since meeting the criteria to demonstrate they haven't changed one bit, and they are a threat to the South Pacific. Not seeing a problem with the designation.

That said, Glen's point that maybe we need legislation to address attacks on allies isn't a bad point. As long as that legislation would afford us similar protection, that should be fine. But I continue to maintain that there is no reason we shouldn't prohibit The Black Hawks under Article 4. Regardless, whatever we do, we shouldn't do nothing and just wait for The Black Hawks -- who are clearly hostile to the South Pacific and will remain hostile to the South Pacific -- to become an even more pressing and more difficult threat to address. We know who they are, we know what they stand for, we know how they regard Feeder and Sinker sovereignty. Let's do something about it.