It's A week was spent by the CRS attempting to reach a mutual agreement with you that provided for leniency. You strung the negotiator along with change after change to the agreement, only to ultimately reject everything.

Additionally, the CRS is conducting interviews with material officials, prompted by your own submitted "depositions." Since you're a fan of trial language: you decided to bring forth witnesses and do a direct examination. We now get to do our cross examination. Given that this is a game and not a job, that people have different work and class schedules, not to mention actual lives to live, this cross-examination will take time.

On the one hand, you decried our initial findings as rushed and inaccurate. And now you're trying to say we can't take time to conduct the investigation wherever it leads, and every day that passes is another indication of your obvious innocence. That's not how an investigation works. If TSP wants a thorough investigatory process, they will get one.