It's an objective fact that this will lead to obstruction. You are literally introducing the ability of any person to force a mandatory 24 hour debate and 3 day vote on any decision made by the Chair. That sounds all fine and dandy as long as you're thinking, "Oh geez, checks and balances!" Not so great when you all are complaining that a debate is going on too long, and then somebody decides "Fuck y'all, I disagree. I motion to overturn the chair's decision."

Why is this necessary? It's not. Are you guys also going to request that we get a vote to overturn MoMA appointing a deputy, firing one, deciding to start a newspaper or end one? No. Because you elected them to make those decisions. You don't vote for them again if you disagree with their decisions, and you recall them if you think they've done something egregious.

You elect a chair to make decisions, too. If you think the chair's decisions shouldn't ever be final, then don't have the chair make those decisions in the first place.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk