@Tsunamy - Well, in regards to a proper investigation, what I would have done would be gather all available evidence, interviewed the various witnesses in detail - Roavin and Ressentine, my superiors in the SPF, in particular - and put it all together. Then I would have scheduled a sit down between the CRS and the accused for a formal interview, during which time you'd try and catch me in a lie, see how evasive I was being, etc. I also would have taken me up on my offer to grant someone on the CRS access to my accounts - you can keep saying that I could have destroyed any and all evidence, but the fact is that I haven't. A bunch of vaguely compromising stuff is still on there - none of it illegal, but still "compromising".

I would also have been very careful to limit any report to those facts that had been proven, and not include all sorts of unsupported assumptions, assertions and accusations.