| [PRE-TRIAL] Roavin v. Cormac |
Whereas the Court Procedures Act requires the High Court to evaluate the propriety of every piece of evidence and witness that either party to a criminal case submits, it is ordered as follows:
Those facts that were brought to the attention of the Court by the Prosecution have been so noted.
In accordance with the Court Procedures Act, the Prosecution and the Defence will have an opportunity to mutually agree on a reasonable time for the collection of witness testimony. In the event that no such agreement prove possible, the Court will determine a time. A limit of three calendar days will be given for the communication of the agreed upon time, with the possibility of an extension at the discretion of the Court. It is so ordered. Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System |
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |