(10-20-2017, 01:41 PM)Belschaft Wrote: 2. a. This would depend on the application in question; some would take a lot longer than others. I expect to be able to acknowledge receipt of an application within 24 hours of it being made, the process of rejecting/accepting it will depend on how long the various security checks take to be completed - which may very well come down to how long the CRS/admin team takes to do them, depending on the level of access the Chair is granted. I think a period of one week from receipt is pretty much the maximum "reasonable" time someone should be waiting, but I'd hope we can get it done a lot quicker.
2. b. Again, this is something that I should be able to do within 24 hours; I check the assembly at least once a day as it is.
2. c. Again, within 24 hours when I check the assembly.

Sold. My threshold would have been double on all of those.

More questions for now.

First: You've been a strong advocate for the enfranchisement of the in-game populace in the past. This is laudable, though many (including myself) felt your activism sometimes reached levels of absurdity. As Chair, you will have the unique responsibility of unilaterally deciding whether or not a proposed amendment requires an in-game vote. While you've expressed more mellow views on this, one remaining fear about a Belschaft Chair of Assembly is that you could potentially engage in "2016-esque shenanigans" and begin to decide that every amendment requires game-side approval. What is your stance? Ideally, could you look through the past few eligible amendments and render your judgement on whether they should have been voted upon game-side or not?

Second, what is your stance on my request to the Chair here?

Depending on your answers, and what a quick perusal of your previous CoA work reveals, I may just have to vote for you. Sorry.