Belschaft Q&A |
(10-20-2017, 02:02 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(10-20-2017, 01:41 PM)Roavin Wrote: I honestly don't care about a presumptive CoA's legislative agenda. They don't need the CoA job to do any of that, and I want to know if we can finally have a CoA that can function. I didn't mean to be dismissive, rather to point out that, in my opinion, the legislative agenda of a prospective Chair should take a backseat to actually having a functioning CoA again (a position that I consider incredibly important). ![]() |
Messages In This Thread |
Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 12:20 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 12:33 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 12:43 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Seraph - 10-20-2017, 12:49 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 12:54 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Seraph - 10-20-2017, 01:00 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 01:04 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 01:21 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 01:41 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 01:41 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 02:26 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 02:02 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 02:28 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 02:15 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by sandaoguo - 10-20-2017, 02:31 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 02:37 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by sandaoguo - 10-20-2017, 02:50 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Seraph - 10-20-2017, 02:53 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 03:06 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 03:42 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 04:14 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 04:27 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 04:38 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 04:50 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 04:55 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 05:09 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-24-2017, 03:43 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
4 Guest(s) |