Belschaft Q&A |
(10-20-2017, 02:26 PM)Roavin Wrote:(10-20-2017, 01:41 PM)Belschaft Wrote: 2. a. This would depend on the application in question; some would take a lot longer than others. I expect to be able to acknowledge receipt of an application within 24 hours of it being made, the process of rejecting/accepting it will depend on how long the various security checks take to be completed - which may very well come down to how long the CRS/admin team takes to do them, depending on the level of access the Chair is granted. I think a period of one week from receipt is pretty much the maximum "reasonable" time someone should be waiting, but I'd hope we can get it done a lot quicker. Just because I'm aiming for 24 hours doesn't mean I'll actually achieve it. Your request seems reasonable, and likely to make things easier for people to understand. As for the issue of the in-game; back then referendums were only required on issues "solely" effecting the in-game region, which was essentially nothing - as I argued at the time. These days it's "directly" effecting the in-game region, which is much more reasonable. I honestly see no more need or reason to campaign in regards to this issue, having "won" the debate - if only by annoying people enough that a more moderate reform than what I was "proposing" was adopted. (10-20-2017, 03:06 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(10-20-2017, 02:15 PM)Belschaft Wrote:(10-20-2017, 02:02 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote:(10-20-2017, 01:41 PM)Roavin Wrote: I honestly don't care about a presumptive CoA's legislative agenda. They don't need the CoA job to do any of that, and I want to know if we can finally have a CoA that can function. I do not think our current criminal system is fit for purpose. This should not be news to anyone. I honestly don't think that the current court has any unique input to offer at this point, simply as these issues have been discussed so often. Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator |
Messages In This Thread |
Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 12:20 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 12:33 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 12:43 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Seraph - 10-20-2017, 12:49 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 12:54 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Seraph - 10-20-2017, 01:00 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 01:04 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 01:21 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 01:41 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 01:41 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 02:26 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 02:02 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 02:28 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 02:15 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by sandaoguo - 10-20-2017, 02:31 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Roavin - 10-20-2017, 02:37 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by sandaoguo - 10-20-2017, 02:50 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Seraph - 10-20-2017, 02:53 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 03:06 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 03:42 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 04:14 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 04:27 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 04:38 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 04:50 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-20-2017, 04:55 PM
Belschaft Q&A - by Kris Kringle - 10-20-2017, 05:09 PM
RE: Belschaft Q&A - by Belschaft - 10-24-2017, 03:43 PM
|
Users browsing this thread: |
1 Guest(s) |