The unparliamentarian language aside (tut tut), I'm not in favour of the motion.

Whilst naturally not knowing all the ins and outs of this (as you would expect us not to be), i do not see from the conversation that has been taking place since the initial post that the relationships are so broken that the current cabinet cannot continue to function until the end of its term.

Indeed if anything it appears that the initial post has allowed an issue to be raised and discussion to begin afresh.

Perhaps, if i may ask, is roavin still of the opinion of his original motion. As, if i understand the pms response to PS2 (question 3) you do not consider the cabinet so dysfunctional it cannot operate successfully until the next election. It would appear to me therefore that, if that is the case, the motion should not be called under article 2 section xi

2. A Motion of No Confidence may be initiated by the Assembly, if the members have lost faith in the effectiveness and activities of the Prime Minister and the Cabinet.

Thank you for your time