(12-30-2018, 02:33 AM)Roavin Wrote: Dear Chairs, separate from this discussion, I think it's worth moving forward with this. Given the drift in this thread, how can we best do so?
There are a number of Chairs o.0
To clarify, that particular amendment and the discussion surrounding it can be found in a separate thread,
Amendment to Article VIII of the Charter (High Court's mandate).
Charter, VIII. The High Court Wrote:4. The High Court has the power to declare any general law or, regulation, Cabinet directive, Chair determination, and Local Council law or regulation, or any other official act of government, in whole or in part, void upon a determination that it violates the terms of this Charter or any other constitutional law.
This thread (which I shall now rename accordingly as well as update the OP) is centred on the following amendment to Article 4 of the
Proscription Act.
Article 4. Judicial Review Wrote:4. Judicial Review
(1) Individuals, regions or organizations subject to a proscription may challenge the issuing authority's determination of hostility in the High Court.
(2) Individuals subject to a proscription of a region or organization may challenge the issuing authority's determination of their membership in that region or organization in the High Court.
(3) For the purposes above, the individual or an individual representing the region or organization must be granted adequate permissions to participate in the High Court proceedings for that case.
![[+]](/images/collapse_collapsed.png "[+]")
Amendment to Article VIII of the Charter (High Court's mandate)![[-]](https://tspforums.xyz/images/sidr/blue/collapse.png)