We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

The Rejected Realms Treaty
#28

(06-29-2014, 02:50 PM)Ditortilla Wrote: Sorry, I'm looking for the documentation that you alluded to:

"We believe strongly in GCR sovereignty, and have a standing order of severely condemning any violation of it."

Cant seem to locate that section in the Charter

Glen was talking about internal Cabinet policy. We have all agreed that GCR sovereignty is paramount to our regional interests.

I know I haven't made the post I promised yet. I've been rather busy these past few days, and will be next week as well since I'm starting finals. I'll try to post later today.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System


Messages In This Thread
The Rejected Realms Treaty - by Arbiter08 - 06-26-2014, 07:36 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .