We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

The Rejected Realms Treaty
#40

(06-30-2014, 01:26 PM)Sandaoguo Wrote:
(06-30-2014, 01:21 PM)Belschaft Wrote: It invites a situation where we will have to breach one or the other treaties.
The only way this would happen is if TNI invites it on themselves by attacking the sovereignty of TRR. Like we've said, treaty or no, it would wholly unacceptable for TNI to directly attack another GCR.

Protecting GCR sovereignty is certainly a commitment we can keep. If TNI feels different, that is their deal. TSP will remain committed to GCR sovereignty.
Our region recognises the concept of war in our legal system. We expect others to recognize our right to wage war, and as such we must too recognize the right of others to do so. We can disapprove of a hypothetical TNI invasion of TRR and we have no legal duty to assist them - which we should not - but they have the undeniable sovereign right to wage war, and as our ally they have a right to expect us to not ally with their enemies.
Minister of Media, Subversion and Sandwich Making
Associate Justice of the High Court and Senior Moderator

[Image: B9ytUsy.png]


Messages In This Thread
The Rejected Realms Treaty - by Arbiter08 - 06-26-2014, 07:36 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .