We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Criminal Complaint (charge someone with a crime under the Criminal Code) [1901] New Haudenosaunee Confederacy v. Concrete Slab
#7

(02-13-2019, 04:43 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: The post has been unsuppressed seemingly for no other reason than this criminal complaint. I have a screenshot of the post being suppressed, which can be viewed here. The screenshot was taken on the 1st of February, according to the information in the file, however I can't really prove that it says that, except with the information in the actual photo. This screenshot was taken 26 days after the message was lodged on the RMB. As of now, the post was lodged 37 days ago, and with some basic math (37-26=11) it would make sense that this screenshot was taken on the 2nd of February (despite what I had said before), as 11 days ago was the 2nd of February, a day after this complaint was posted.

The reason I just unsuppressed the post was because your case reminded me of said post and I realized it no longer had to be suppressed. 
(02-13-2019, 04:43 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: That was not your claim of why you had suppressed it. Your claim was that it was due to usage of the term "damn", as shown in the linked post. However, this claim also doesn't work, because I did not say that I don't care about how I treat you. You are basically just straight-up lying.

I am not "straight-up lying" as you so brashly put it. I suppressed the post for both those reasons, not just because of the usage of "damn". And no matter what you said, I still interpreted the message as harmful and suppressed it, but was not going to say "NHC hurt my feelings" on the rmb.
(02-13-2019, 04:43 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: And that matters because...? (*happened btw)
EDIT: You not being an LC doesn't make you immune to getting criminal complaints against you. I really should've said this more clearly.

Where did I say that I thought this? I only mentioned it was before my time as Local Councillor to show it was a long time ago.
(02-13-2019, 04:43 PM)New Haudenosaunee Confederacy Wrote: Yes, I can at least understand that, but that ALSO doesn't matter. You still suppressed critical speech.

This does ALSO matter because the "critical speech" had the usage of phrases I deemed inappropriate, and thus suppressed.
Concrete Slab
Coral Guard Member
5x Local Councillor 
TSP Legislator and Citizen
Ambassador to the League 
Author of GAR #471, #479, and SCR #271
Co-author of SCR #300
Founded 1/25/18
[-] The following 1 user Likes Concrete Slab's post:
  • Volaworand
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Indictment - by Kris Kringle - 02-10-2019, 10:57 PM
RE: Criminal Complaint Against Concrete Slab 2: Electric Boogaloo - by Concrete Slab - 02-13-2019, 06:07 PM
1901.SH - by Kris Kringle - 05-22-2020, 04:40 PM
Sentence - by Kris Kringle - 05-27-2020, 10:11 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .