or Create an account
  The South Pacific Government District High Court [LQ] [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities
  • Offline Tsunamy
    Clever, but devastating.
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       5,015
    Threads:       504
    Rep:       1,198
    Credits: 2,938,200¢
#7
03-16-2019, 09:59 PM

(03-16-2019, 09:49 PM)Kris Kringle Wrote: That would not be an accurate assumption. If Concrete Slab, or someone so authorised by him, were to ask for a more detailed explanation in the relevant thread, the Court would be happy to oblige.

I'm asking a question of broader implication than that case, regardless. Given that, I don't think it's appropriate for the Court's ruling to hinge on whether or not Concrete Slab decides to ask the question.
-tsunamy
[forum admin]
[-] The following 3 users Like Tsunamy's post:
  • Imperial Frost Federation, The Sakhalinsk Empire, Volaworand
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Notice of Reception - by Kris Kringle - 03-16-2019, 09:04 AM
RE: [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities - by Tsunamy - 03-16-2019, 09:59 PM
Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 03-20-2019, 11:56 PM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Government District High Court [LQ] [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .