We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities
#8

[Image: BYEo2lg.png]

Determination of Justiciability
Identity Theft and Concealed Identities | 1912.DJ

Whereas Tsunamy has petitioned this Court to interpret the law with the following question:

Would negative campaigning under an assumed identity would be considered "identity fraud"?

Whereas this Court has reviewed the merits of such a request on the basis of its legal necessity and potential to impact present and future policies.

It is resolved with respect to these legal questions as follows:
  1. It is not deemed justiciable.
  2. The Court may provide an opinion on its reasons for issuing this determination, at the request of the petitioner, or any party so authorised by them, no later than seven days following the publication of this Determination.
It is so ordered.

Kris Kringle
Chief Justice
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Notice of Reception - by Kris Kringle - 03-16-2019, 09:04 AM
Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 03-20-2019, 11:56 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .