or Create an account
  The South Pacific Government District High Court [LQ] [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities

We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Legal Question (interpret the meaning and application of a law) [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities
  • Offline Kris Kringle
    Chief Justice
  • *******
  • Joined:       Mar 2014
    Posts:       15,572
    Threads:       778
    Rep:       1,751
    Credits: 2,947,300¢
#17
03-21-2019, 05:08 PM

I see no fiasco. You asked a question, it was deemed non-justiciable. There is nothing more to that.


Inviato dal mio iPhone utilizzando Tapatalk
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System
Reply


Messages In This Thread
Notice of Reception - by Kris Kringle - 03-16-2019, 09:04 AM
Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 03-20-2019, 11:56 PM
[1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities - by Kris Kringle - 03-21-2019, 05:08 PM



Users browsing this thread:
1 Guest(s)



  The South Pacific Government District High Court [LQ] [1912] Identity Theft and Concealed Identities


Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .