[DEBATING] A1906.01: Alignment Act |
First, I do want to say that some thing I helped write this, but that's not actually true. In my opinion, we maybe should hold off until the debate percolates through the election. But we've already started this, so we as well continue.
I do agree that the working is a bit off, as is the format. But I disagree that it's unnecessary to have a resolution that clearly and explicitly states we are defender. It's not just an important symbol and rallying cry, it's an historic marker. We have short memories in this game, and I don't want us to forget that we all voted on a simple resolution declaring ourselves defender. (And that it either passed or failed.) Hiding this away in the depths of laws and military manuals isn't good enough. While it's necessary to make those legal changes, it's very important to have a simple and clear resolution stating what our values are. I would offer something along the lines of this: Quote:Whereas the Coalition of the South Pacific is founded upon dedication to democratic principles, including the right of a community to exist peacefully and free from unprovoked attack; |
Users browsing this thread: |
4 Guest(s) |