(06-13-2019, 08:33 AM)Tsunamy Wrote: Sure, sure. It doesn't have to be clearly stated how we'd go about this, just generally that we support democracy and self selection for other regions as well. And we don't necessarily want to force democracy on those who don't want it.

Yep! Regional self-determination would be a key value and more important than the export of democracy. Let's say for example that that Osirans are given a democratic choice over their governance - they would most likely not choose a democratic system. And we shouldn't then force a democracy upon them.

(06-13-2019, 08:33 AM)Tsunamy Wrote: This situation I'm thinking of is, say an officially elected delegate somewhere couped, (i.e. Milo for instance), we'd want to/be willing to intervene on behalf of the natives (i.e. us). That would be something we can support under this, yes?

Yes. Might be a bit difficult in some cases to determine who's "right", but in the case of Milo it was an obvious illegal dissolution of the Coalition, so yeah we'd stand behind those fighting him.