We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Potential Withdraw from The January Accords
#17

(07-03-2019, 08:33 AM)Kris Kringle Wrote: I think that's a faulty logic. Reducing your pool of possible active nations doesn't make your region any more active, it just increases the percentage of active nations; as would happen in a case of 2 active nations out of 200 vs 2 active nations out of 20. Obviously you'll have a higher percentage in the latter, but you still only have 2 active nations.

I think it's worth noting that if anything, this measure can only reduce the total amount of activity. After all, who is to say those 180 nations will do absolutely nothing.

It's not even a stretch to suggest that. You could be actively be answering issues, actively posting on the RMB. But despite that if you don't join the WA you could still be banned as a "marsupial". The net result being a loss of activity.

And for the point Tsu made, if they're going to CTE soon anyway, then what's the point? Give it a couple weeks and NS will do the job for you, without forcing the region to waste time and influence on it.

All it does is weaken the region by purging potential activity and draining influence from our security. Not to mention how deplorable some of that rhetoric is.
[-] The following 2 users Like Farengeto's post:
  • Beepee, The Sakhalinsk Empire


Messages In This Thread
RE: Potential Withdraw from The January Accords - by Farengeto - 07-03-2019, 10:47 AM



Users browsing this thread:
2 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .