(08-03-2019, 08:20 AM)Belschaft Wrote: There is no version of this proposal - that we put a small, secretive and self-selecting security body in charge of deciding who can vote and stand in our elections - that I am okay with @Tsunamy. It is not good for our democracy, period.

If these proposals somehow passed the Assembly they would never be approved in-game.

To clarify, my post was more about the structure of the organizations more so than the overall proposal. Having a CSI and a DC puts an extra layer of protection into things like banjections and whatnot since one group would have to approve it and the other would have to carry it out.

Whereas you seem to be taking issue with the the powers and methods of member selection that are ascribed within the bill, @Belschaft. And, which is understandable.

Personally, I'm a fan of having two distinct bodies because then we could have a slew of DC members that also aren't expected to make security decisions — but could be active in the region pending a coup. I'm less sold on the other parts of it.