Yay, assembly debate! \o/

(12-13-2019, 10:03 AM)Tsunamy Wrote: I'm not keen on 1.4. One of the strengths of the current CRS system is that people can self select to apply for the org, thereby making their locked nation their choice rather than done out of commitment. I think that should remain for the DC.

I see what you're saying, but in practice, the nominations that Cabinet makes generally come through some sort of application process, be it for justices or for LegComm or what have you.

I don't feel too strongly about it, though. I'd like the general madnate for Cabinet because it makes quite a few things in our laws simpler, but we can do both, really.

(12-13-2019, 10:29 AM)Amerion Wrote: On (3.4), will Cabinet no longer have this authority?

Cabinet would still have that authority as well, just as now. 3.4 basically means: In the Proscription Act, replace "CRS" with "CSI".