To add to my previous post: We have people filing LoAs over their frustrations left and right, from both sides of this issue. Forcing the issue now isn't going to help that sentiment whatsoever, because whoever forces the vote will just be seen negatively by the other side and worsen those same frustrations. The visceral tensions right now are simply too high.

The nature of MoRA's involvement as a participant in its own right during this debate was a large problem, and I think most people on both sides of this issue can agree to that. That's over now (and yes, that part is in my power - I can't force people to contribute, but I can break up the echo chamber that was preventing it in the first place). Some fruits of that issue still linger, but that will go away in time (and soon at that, I'd suspect) as one side recognizes that they aren't summarily ignored and dismissed, and the other side recognizes that the demeanor from MoRA as an institution that they found so frustrating is now no longer a thing.

Just to make it clear before anybody gets the wrong idea: My involvement in MoRA was not in any way predicated on me gaining an advantage for "my" preferred outcome on this debate (and I see why it might appear that way at first glance, given that I've been a pro-split supporter before); if I had a corrupt intent like that, I would have just gotten involved way earlier