I mean, fwiw, I don't actually mind if we have a process for SC voting in the WA. To be the old man here, but when I was delegate I always consulted with the Cabinet on any of the SC proposals before voting. GA votes are, eh, whatever, but SC should probably be more aligned with our security perspective.

As such, if these aren't legally binding (meaning that voting differently won't automatically kill the treaty) and they will help us coordinate with some of our allies — I don't see anything objectionable.

Would still be interested in stats re: voting between us and the charter members, but otherwise, looks good.