We've moved, ! Update your bookmarks to https://thesouthpacific.org! These forums are being archived.

Dismiss this notice
See LegComm's announcement to make sure you're still a legislator on the new forums!

Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act
#13

(08-06-2021, 11:35 AM)Belschaft Wrote: Whilst ideally people should be able to give firm timescales that isn’t always going to be the case.

I don’t agree with that. People always should provide a reasonable end to their leave. If necessary it can be renewed, but nobody should be allowed to be on leave indefinitely. That may be unfair for the applicant, but I don’t think it’s fair to all other legislators that someone could circumvent activity requirements that easily.
Former Delegate of the South Pacific
Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator.
I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum.

Legal Resources:
THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System


Messages In This Thread
RE: Amendment to the Legislator Committee Act - by Kris Kringle - 08-06-2021, 12:33 PM



Users browsing this thread:
6 Guest(s)





Theme © iAndrew 2018 Forum software by © MyBB .