(09-06-2022, 07:34 PM)maluhia Wrote:

(09-06-2022, 07:29 PM)Jay Coop Wrote:

(09-06-2022, 05:20 PM)maluhia Wrote: -snip-

-snip-

I see that. But again…do you have trust in our current LCs?

And would you appoint someone who is never on the RMB if passed?

I think that’s a non issue. I doubt that whomever ends up appointing the Mod(s) of the RMB would take into consideration whether they are active on the very platform they are being chosen to moderate. That’s like putting an RMB only person in charge of moderating the Assembly area. It is impractical and illogical to suggest that we do that for the Assembly, so why would we do it for the RMB?

Speaking specifically to trust, it isn’t a matter of whether we trust the LC. Rather, the LC has proven over several terms, and several years, that they have neglected their duties to be the “home-rule” government, and instead have evolved almost exclusively into RMB moderation. That isn’t necessarily a bad thing that the role has evolved, but it doesn’t make sense to allow the same codified mandate to remain in effect, when they are not carrying it out.

As a former LC myself (back in 2017), I must admit I did next to no RMB moderation and instead did what I could to help with integration between forums and RMB.