| Poll: Please identify your preferred Regional and Military alignment/identification You do not have permission to vote in this poll. |
|||
| Regional: Defender | 2 | 4.08% | |
| Regional: Raider | 0 | 0% | |
| Regional: Independent | 8 | 16.33% | |
| Regional: Imperialist | 0 | 0% | |
| Regional: Non-Aligned (independent) | 14 | 28.57% | |
| Military: Defender | 2 | 4.08% | |
| Military: Raider | 0 | 0% | |
| Military: Independent | 7 | 14.29% | |
| Military: Imperialist | 1 | 2.04% | |
| Military: Non-Aligned (independent) | 15 | 30.61% | |
| Total | 49 vote(s) | 100% | |
| * You voted for this item. | [Show Results] |
| Poll: Military and Regional Alignment |
Eh, I think a non-aligned military is one that simply exists for fun, is not a tool of foreign affairs, and doesn't really have any chance at existing in a region like this. The whole "according to foreign policy interests" is what we've all argued about, because "foreign policy interests" tend to = raiding.
|
| Messages In This Thread |
|
Poll: Military and Regional Alignment - by Belschaft - 01-27-2015, 05:05 PM
|
| Users browsing this thread: |
| 1 Guest(s) |