(04-23-2015, 05:29 PM)Darkstrait Wrote: (04-23-2015, 03:36 PM)Bonaugure Wrote: (04-23-2015, 03:14 PM)ProfessorHenn Wrote: Yeah, having a little bit of both is good in a person. If it's entirely one end, then you will be viewed as a radical, by both sides.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
* Bonaugure nods.
Indeed.
Yeah. I mean, look at the money-mad investors that drove the US into both the Great Depression and the more recent 2008 recession. But on the other hand, look at Stalin and Mao. Both of them were whackjobs, when you look at some of the crazy stuff they did.
But find a middle ground between the endless competition of capitalism and the brutally country-oriented communist autocracies, and you have democratic socialism, an excellent compromise that balances the high points of both extremes.
And how is this? I know a little bit of socialism, but I don't know about democratic socialism.
Deputy Regional Minister of the Planning and Development Agency(March 8-May 19, 2014)
Local Council Member(April 24-August 11)
Court Justice of TSP(August 15-December 7)
"The 1% is like a 1% battery charge. It will die out if it is not charged(the charge is the 99%). But if you don't charge it, it will die for sure, sooner or later"
- Me (2001- Present)
"Change is the world's blood"
- Me (2001-Present)