Review Request (overturn a decision by a government institution or official) [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid

Kris Kringle Chief Justice Joined:       Mar 2014 Posts:       15,572 Threads:       778 Rep:       1,751 Credits: 2,920,300¢ #8 05-20-2022, 06:25 PM HIGH COURT OF THE SOUTH PACIFIC [2206.HR] REVIEW OF THE CHAIR OF THE ASSEMBLY'S DECISION TO MARK A VOTE INVALID SUBMISSION 19 MAY 2022 | JUSTICIABILITY 20 MAY 2022 Whereas this Court has been asked to exercise the judicial power vested in it by Article VIII of the Charter of the South Pacific, it is resolved as follows: DETERMINATION OF JUSTICIABILITY This case is found justiciable and shall be duly considered under all designations assigned by document 2206.HR.NR. EXPEDITED TREATMENT This case shall be subject to expedited treatment and shall be managed accordingly with respect to all relevant deadlines in compliance with the Standards for Case Management. SUBMISSION OF BRIEFS AMICUS CURIAE Interested parties may submit briefs amicus curiae to argue their views on the whole or a part of this case no later than 1653400800, and shall thereafter be liable to answer any questions that the Court may have in relation to their brief. SUBMISSION OF REQUESTS FOR RECUSAL Interested parties may request the recusal of the Chief Justice or any Associate Justice no later than 1653228000 10:00 UTC. Any such requests should provide clear reasons to support the requested recusal and explain the possible negative impact of a failure to recuse. RETENTION OF RIGHTS The Court retains the right to consult with, and request further testimony and evidence from, government institutions and other third parties as necessary to adequately exercise its sole right to issue an opinion on this case. It is so ordered. 2206.HR.DJ | Issued 20 May 2022 Former Delegate of the South Pacific Posts outside High Court venues should be taken as those of any other legislator. I do not participate in the regional server, but I am happy to talk through instant messaging or on the forum. Legal Resources: THE MATT-DUCK Law Archive | Mavenu Diplomatic Archive | Rules of the High Court | Case Submission System | Online Rulings Consultation System Reply   • Reply

Messages In This Thread

[2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by im_a_waffle1 - 05-19-2022, 06:47 PM RE: Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by im_a_waffle1 - 05-19-2022, 07:35 PM RE: Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Ryccia - 05-19-2022, 08:04 PM RE: Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Domais - 05-19-2022, 10:55 PM Notice of Reception - by Kris Kringle - 05-19-2022, 10:57 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Jay Coop - 05-19-2022, 11:28 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Jebediah - 05-20-2022, 06:15 AM Determination of Justiciability - by Kris Kringle - 05-20-2022, 06:25 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Jay Coop - 05-20-2022, 09:23 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Bleakfoot - 05-21-2022, 01:42 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Jebediah - 05-24-2022, 07:02 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Kris Kringle - 05-24-2022, 09:48 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Domais - 05-24-2022, 11:12 PM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by Pronoun - 05-26-2022, 12:54 AM RE: [2206.HR] Review of the Chair of the Assembly's Decision to Mark a Vote Invalid - by rosaferri - 05-26-2022, 01:02 AM Opinion - by Kris Kringle - 05-26-2022, 09:56 PM

Users browsing this thread:

1 Guest(s)